<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 65 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241840</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as there was no evidence of mala fide intention presented, rendering the penalty under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 unjustifiable. The judge emphasized the importance of establishing mala fide intent for penalties under the Act and the necessity of supporting evidence in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 08:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 65 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241840</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as there was no evidence of mala fide intention presented, rendering the penalty under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 unjustifiable. The judge emphasized the importance of establishing mala fide intent for penalties under the Act and the necessity of supporting evidence in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>