<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 55 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241830</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the denial of credit for banking and financial services and business auxiliary services. The services were deemed to be in relation to the manufacture and export of goods, meeting the criteria of &#039;input service&#039; as defined under Rule 2(l).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 55 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241830</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the denial of credit for banking and financial services and business auxiliary services. The services were deemed to be in relation to the manufacture and export of goods, meeting the criteria of &#039;input service&#039; as defined under Rule 2(l).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>