<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court accepts petitioner&#039;s argument for delay condonation due to misdirected notice to Panchkula taken over by Bank.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16617</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay - The plea of the petitioner is that the notice was sent at Panchkula, which was taken over by the Bank, and therefore, he did not receive the order of the Commissioner merits acceptance. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 15:37:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 15:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court accepts petitioner&#039;s argument for delay condonation due to misdirected notice to Panchkula taken over by Bank.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16617</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay - The plea of the petitioner is that the notice was sent at Panchkula, which was taken over by the Bank, and therefore, he did not receive the order of the Commissioner merits acceptance. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 15:37:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>