<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 46 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241821</link>
    <description>The appeal seeking waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed by the judge, finding no merit in the appeal. Additionally, the Commissioner (Appeals) was held not authorized to condone the delay in filing the appeal beyond the statutory limit of three months, based on a precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court. The decision emphasizes adherence to statutory timelines and legal precedents in tax dispute matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:54:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 46 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241821</link>
      <description>The appeal seeking waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed by the judge, finding no merit in the appeal. Additionally, the Commissioner (Appeals) was held not authorized to condone the delay in filing the appeal beyond the statutory limit of three months, based on a precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court. The decision emphasizes adherence to statutory timelines and legal precedents in tax dispute matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>