<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 42 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting waiver of pre-deposit of service tax amount, interest, and penalty. It was found that prior to 1.7.2010, renting of vacant land was not subject to service tax, and as the appellant had only provided vacant land on lease before this date, the demand for service tax was not applicable. The Tribunal acknowledged the change in the scope of service tax on renting of immovable property before and after 1.7.2010, allowing the waiver and stay of recovery pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 42 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting waiver of pre-deposit of service tax amount, interest, and penalty. It was found that prior to 1.7.2010, renting of vacant land was not subject to service tax, and as the appellant had only provided vacant land on lease before this date, the demand for service tax was not applicable. The Tribunal acknowledged the change in the scope of service tax on renting of immovable property before and after 1.7.2010, allowing the waiver and stay of recovery pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>