<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 16 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to verify the R&amp;amp;D expenditure&#039;s eligibility under section 35(2AB). The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on consistency with previous rulings and the lack of substantive evidence from the Revenue to justify the disallowances and adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 16 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to verify the R&amp;amp;D expenditure&#039;s eligibility under section 35(2AB). The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on consistency with previous rulings and the lack of substantive evidence from the Revenue to justify the disallowances and adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>