<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 6 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241781</link>
    <description>The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeals concerning the applicability of Sec.5 and Sec.29(2) of the Limitation Act to appeals under Sec. 35 of the Central Excise Act. Relying on Apex Court rulings, the High Court emphasized the limited power of appellate authorities to condone delays beyond statutory limits for filing appeals. The Court highlighted the legislative intent to restrict time limits for appeals and references strictly. Despite the appellant&#039;s counsel&#039;s lack of awareness of relevant precedents, the Court chose not to take further action, ultimately dismissing the appeals and stay applications based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 6 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241781</link>
      <description>The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeals concerning the applicability of Sec.5 and Sec.29(2) of the Limitation Act to appeals under Sec. 35 of the Central Excise Act. Relying on Apex Court rulings, the High Court emphasized the limited power of appellate authorities to condone delays beyond statutory limits for filing appeals. The Court highlighted the legislative intent to restrict time limits for appeals and references strictly. Despite the appellant&#039;s counsel&#039;s lack of awareness of relevant precedents, the Court chose not to take further action, ultimately dismissing the appeals and stay applications based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>