<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241776</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order dated 28-1-2010 regarding the procurement of CT-2 certificates. The department&#039;s argument that the assessee obtained certificates without the supplier having the required license was deemed insufficient to warrant rectification. The Tribunal found no error apparent on the face of records and emphasized the order&#039;s appealability, concluding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:49:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241776</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order dated 28-1-2010 regarding the procurement of CT-2 certificates. The department&#039;s argument that the assessee obtained certificates without the supplier having the required license was deemed insufficient to warrant rectification. The Tribunal found no error apparent on the face of records and emphasized the order&#039;s appealability, concluding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>