<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1272 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161088</link>
    <description>An exemption entry for sales of goods to military personnel by defence service installations was construed purposively to cover sales of Indian-made foreign liquor to defence personnel and defence organisations where the burden ultimately fell on military personnel. The Tribunal&#039;s view was accepted because the exemption could not be denied merely due to the immediate buyer being a defence organisation, and later governmental clarification in the finance department notification supported that legislative understanding. The disputed sales were therefore treated as exempt, and no basis remained to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:12:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1272 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161088</link>
      <description>An exemption entry for sales of goods to military personnel by defence service installations was construed purposively to cover sales of Indian-made foreign liquor to defence personnel and defence organisations where the burden ultimately fell on military personnel. The Tribunal&#039;s view was accepted because the exemption could not be denied merely due to the immediate buyer being a defence organisation, and later governmental clarification in the finance department notification supported that legislative understanding. The disputed sales were therefore treated as exempt, and no basis remained to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>