<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1123 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161082</link>
    <description>Raw rubber sheets or RMA sheets are treated as rubber products for sales tax classification because processing such as preservation, coagulation, drying, grading and packing creates a commercially distinct and marketable commodity. Classification therefore depends on the article&#039;s commercial identity in trade, not merely its original raw form. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s view that the goods fell within entry 101 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 as rubber products was supported by the evidence and was not shown to be perverse, so the goods were not taxable only at the general rate applicable to raw rubber.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1123 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161082</link>
      <description>Raw rubber sheets or RMA sheets are treated as rubber products for sales tax classification because processing such as preservation, coagulation, drying, grading and packing creates a commercially distinct and marketable commodity. Classification therefore depends on the article&#039;s commercial identity in trade, not merely its original raw form. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s view that the goods fell within entry 101 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 as rubber products was supported by the evidence and was not shown to be perverse, so the goods were not taxable only at the general rate applicable to raw rubber.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>