<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 894 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161066</link>
    <description>A restrictive reading of sales tax exemption provisions was rejected where the statutory Schedule expressly extended the benefit to goods manufactured by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission and sold by its authorised representatives. The Court held that administrative circulars, though imperfectly drafted, could not be used to exclude duly authorised private dealers or stockists when the exemption language did not clearly impose such a limitation. The exemption was therefore treated as attaching to the products and covering authorised sellers, making the revisional order unsustainable and restoring the earlier appellate relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 894 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161066</link>
      <description>A restrictive reading of sales tax exemption provisions was rejected where the statutory Schedule expressly extended the benefit to goods manufactured by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission and sold by its authorised representatives. The Court held that administrative circulars, though imperfectly drafted, could not be used to exclude duly authorised private dealers or stockists when the exemption language did not clearly impose such a limitation. The exemption was therefore treated as attaching to the products and covering authorised sellers, making the revisional order unsustainable and restoring the earlier appellate relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>