<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1008 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161058</link>
    <description>An incentive scheme must be applied within its express operative field: units already covered by the 1985 dispensation were validly excluded from the Rajasthan Sales Tax New Incentive Scheme, 1989, and could not switch to that scheme. The 1989 scheme was read prospectively and as a whole so that its clauses on pending or time-barred applications applied only to units already within the 1987 incentive regime. Where the 1987 scheme prescribed a fixed option period and contained no power to extend time, the District Level Screening Committee could not condone delay, reopen a final rejection, or treat a belated application as maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:21:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1008 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161058</link>
      <description>An incentive scheme must be applied within its express operative field: units already covered by the 1985 dispensation were validly excluded from the Rajasthan Sales Tax New Incentive Scheme, 1989, and could not switch to that scheme. The 1989 scheme was read prospectively and as a whole so that its clauses on pending or time-barred applications applied only to units already within the 1987 incentive regime. Where the 1987 scheme prescribed a fixed option period and contained no power to extend time, the District Level Screening Committee could not condone delay, reopen a final rejection, or treat a belated application as maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>