<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1433 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. It ruled in favor of the Respondents, finding that the shortfall in service tax payment was due to a calculation error and not intentional evasion. The Tribunal considered the Respondents&#039; prompt rectification of the shortfall and payment of interest for the delay, concluding that no penalties were justified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1433 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. It ruled in favor of the Respondents, finding that the shortfall in service tax payment was due to a calculation error and not intentional evasion. The Tribunal considered the Respondents&#039; prompt rectification of the shortfall and payment of interest for the delay, concluding that no penalties were justified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>