<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241745</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the department&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes. The cases were remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-examination due to the lack of concrete evidence supporting the additions and the surrender of income by the company. The ITAT emphasized the necessity for corroborative evidence before making such additions, directing a proper examination of the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241745</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the department&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes. The cases were remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-examination due to the lack of concrete evidence supporting the additions and the surrender of income by the company. The ITAT emphasized the necessity for corroborative evidence before making such additions, directing a proper examination of the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>