<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1402 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to non-receipt of the adjudication order, as it was sent to the wrong address. However, the Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s decision to require the deposit of duty and interest for an advance license obtained through false means. The applicant was directed to comply within eight weeks, with penalties waived upon deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1402 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to non-receipt of the adjudication order, as it was sent to the wrong address. However, the Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s decision to require the deposit of duty and interest for an advance license obtained through false means. The applicant was directed to comply within eight weeks, with penalties waived upon deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>