https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241729 In a classification dispute over excisable goods, the tribunal found a strong prima facie case for treating the product as an Ayurvedic medicament rather than an edible preparation. Prior classifications of the same product by other Commissionerates supported the applicant's plea, and the challenge to differential treatment was not addressed in the impugned order. The record did not substantiate the Revenue's suggestion that goods manufactured at different locations were materially different. Applying the principle that the same goods should ordinarily receive uniform classification, the tribunal held that complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was warranted pending appeal. en-us Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:11:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241729 In a classification dispute over excisable goods, the tribunal found a strong prima facie case for treating the product as an Ayurvedic medicament rather than an edible preparation. Prior classifications of the same product by other Commissionerates supported the applicant's plea, and the challenge to differential treatment was not addressed in the impugned order. The record did not substantiate the Revenue's suggestion that goods manufactured at different locations were materially different. Applying the principle that the same goods should ordinarily receive uniform classification, the tribunal held that complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was warranted pending appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241729