<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1387 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for recalling the order and restoration of appeal, finding that there was no violation of natural justice principles. The appellant&#039;s failure to provide a valid reason for their absence on the hearing date, despite multiple opportunities to present their case, led to the denial of further adjournment requests. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of demonstrating a sufficient cause for absence and concluded that the appellant&#039;s claim lacked merit, ultimately dismissing the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1387 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for recalling the order and restoration of appeal, finding that there was no violation of natural justice principles. The appellant&#039;s failure to provide a valid reason for their absence on the hearing date, despite multiple opportunities to present their case, led to the denial of further adjournment requests. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of demonstrating a sufficient cause for absence and concluded that the appellant&#039;s claim lacked merit, ultimately dismissing the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>