<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1098 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161042</link>
    <description>A State cess described as social security was examined for legislative competence and for compliance with the constitutional scheme for State revenues. The text states that welfare entries may support legislation on social welfare or pensions, but they do not by themselves confer taxing power; taxation must rest on a proper legislative source. It also notes that a levy cannot divert revenue away from the Consolidated Fund into an executive-controlled fund outside legislative appropriation, as this conflicts with the constitutional provisions governing State finances. The document further records that sales tax exemption did not, by itself, prevent a separate cess, so the estoppel plea failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:40:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1098 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161042</link>
      <description>A State cess described as social security was examined for legislative competence and for compliance with the constitutional scheme for State revenues. The text states that welfare entries may support legislation on social welfare or pensions, but they do not by themselves confer taxing power; taxation must rest on a proper legislative source. It also notes that a levy cannot divert revenue away from the Consolidated Fund into an executive-controlled fund outside legislative appropriation, as this conflicts with the constitutional provisions governing State finances. The document further records that sales tax exemption did not, by itself, prevent a separate cess, so the estoppel plea failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>