<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 803 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161041</link>
    <description>A deduction-at-source mechanism for works contracts was treated as valid where it applied only to contractors liable to tax, provided certificate-based exemption, and allowed adjustment or refund on final assessment. On that basis, the Kerala scheme was considered intra vires and within the State&#039;s legislative competence because it operated as a provisional collection device and not as a levy on non-taxable inter-State, outside-State, or import transactions. Disputed questions whether particular transactions were inter-State sales or otherwise exempt were found unsuitable for writ adjudication, leaving the parties to statutory remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 803 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161041</link>
      <description>A deduction-at-source mechanism for works contracts was treated as valid where it applied only to contractors liable to tax, provided certificate-based exemption, and allowed adjustment or refund on final assessment. On that basis, the Kerala scheme was considered intra vires and within the State&#039;s legislative competence because it operated as a provisional collection device and not as a levy on non-taxable inter-State, outside-State, or import transactions. Disputed questions whether particular transactions were inter-State sales or otherwise exempt were found unsuitable for writ adjudication, leaving the parties to statutory remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>