<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1097 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161040</link>
    <description>Goods moved from outside the State under a contract with the outside supplier constituted an inter-State sale under the Central Sales Tax Act, and the subsequent transfer of documents of title during transit to the lessee fell within section 3(b) as a transit sale. The question whether exemption under section 6(2) was available had to be examined under the Central Sales Tax Act itself, not under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. Production of form XXXII did not change the character of the transaction or confer power to assess it as an intra-State sale. The assessment of the disputed turnover under section 12(4) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act was therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1097 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161040</link>
      <description>Goods moved from outside the State under a contract with the outside supplier constituted an inter-State sale under the Central Sales Tax Act, and the subsequent transfer of documents of title during transit to the lessee fell within section 3(b) as a transit sale. The question whether exemption under section 6(2) was available had to be examined under the Central Sales Tax Act itself, not under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. Production of form XXXII did not change the character of the transaction or confer power to assess it as an intra-State sale. The assessment of the disputed turnover under section 12(4) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act was therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>