<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1355 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161035</link>
    <description>A notice under section 11(2) stating that non-compliance would lead to best judgment assessment was treated as an effective step initiating proceedings under section 11(4), so the assessment was not time-barred. The turnover estimate was upheld because some estimation is inherent in best judgment assessment, the figure was supported by the preceding year&#039;s turnover and the assessee had prior notice but produced no books or objection at that stage. On those facts, the estimate was not found arbitrary, and the assessment was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:07:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1355 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161035</link>
      <description>A notice under section 11(2) stating that non-compliance would lead to best judgment assessment was treated as an effective step initiating proceedings under section 11(4), so the assessment was not time-barred. The turnover estimate was upheld because some estimation is inherent in best judgment assessment, the figure was supported by the preceding year&#039;s turnover and the assessee had prior notice but produced no books or objection at that stage. On those facts, the estimate was not found arbitrary, and the assessment was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>