<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 890 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161015</link>
    <description>A classification ruling under section 42-B of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act must be based on the nature and use of the goods, their characteristics, and all relevant schedule and exemption entries. The Commissioner must consider competing entries, record findings on why the goods do not fall within the claimed exemption, and explain why they belong in the taxable entry. An order that examines only a partial entry or omits material exemption provisions shows non-application of mind and cannot stand in writ jurisdiction; the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh, reasoned consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 13:38:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 890 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161015</link>
      <description>A classification ruling under section 42-B of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act must be based on the nature and use of the goods, their characteristics, and all relevant schedule and exemption entries. The Commissioner must consider competing entries, record findings on why the goods do not fall within the claimed exemption, and explain why they belong in the taxable entry. An order that examines only a partial entry or omits material exemption provisions shows non-application of mind and cannot stand in writ jurisdiction; the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh, reasoned consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>