<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 992 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161014</link>
    <description>In reference proceedings under section 69 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, the High Court may permit amendment of a proposed question so long as it continues to reflect the same legal controversy arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order. Exact identity of wording with the original draft is not required if the redrafted question correctly states the issue already raised before the Tribunal. The amendment was permissible because it captured the real dispute over whether the goods fell within entry No. 12(iv) of Schedule II, Part A or the residuary entry. The Court did not decide the classification issue itself and directed reference of the amended question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 13:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 992 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161014</link>
      <description>In reference proceedings under section 69 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, the High Court may permit amendment of a proposed question so long as it continues to reflect the same legal controversy arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order. Exact identity of wording with the original draft is not required if the redrafted question correctly states the issue already raised before the Tribunal. The amendment was permissible because it captured the real dispute over whether the goods fell within entry No. 12(iv) of Schedule II, Part A or the residuary entry. The Court did not decide the classification issue itself and directed reference of the amended question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>