<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 949 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161012</link>
    <description>An exemption notification for turnover tax on manufactured tea was conditioned on production of a prescribed declaration, but the Court held that the declaration was not the exclusive mode of proof. If the relevant fact could be established by other satisfactory evidence showing tax paid at the second point of sale, the exemption could not be denied solely for non-production of the form unless the notification expressly barred alternative proof. The assessee was therefore entitled to adduce substitute evidence, and the matter required reconsideration on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 13:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 949 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161012</link>
      <description>An exemption notification for turnover tax on manufactured tea was conditioned on production of a prescribed declaration, but the Court held that the declaration was not the exclusive mode of proof. If the relevant fact could be established by other satisfactory evidence showing tax paid at the second point of sale, the exemption could not be denied solely for non-production of the form unless the notification expressly barred alternative proof. The assessee was therefore entitled to adduce substitute evidence, and the matter required reconsideration on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>