<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1119 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161006</link>
    <description>Registration applications from small-scale industrial units under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act had to be considered promptly and with a rational approach, and the authority was required to act on the applications without avoidable delay. Insistence on additional security before registration was not justified as a threshold condition; such security could be considered only after registration, when dealings could be assessed. The authority retained power to protect revenue, but that safeguard was to operate post-registration. The applications were directed to be examined forthwith, with appropriate action for issuance of registration certificates within one month.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:46:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1119 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161006</link>
      <description>Registration applications from small-scale industrial units under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act had to be considered promptly and with a rational approach, and the authority was required to act on the applications without avoidable delay. Insistence on additional security before registration was not justified as a threshold condition; such security could be considered only after registration, when dealings could be assessed. The authority retained power to protect revenue, but that safeguard was to operate post-registration. The applications were directed to be examined forthwith, with appropriate action for issuance of registration certificates within one month.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>