<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1353 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the professional and consultancy fee as revenue expenditure and treating the advertisement and sales promotion expenses as revenue expenditure. The expenses were deemed to be incurred in the normal course of business without creating enduring benefits beyond the relevant year. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling led to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1353 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the professional and consultancy fee as revenue expenditure and treating the advertisement and sales promotion expenses as revenue expenditure. The expenses were deemed to be incurred in the normal course of business without creating enduring benefits beyond the relevant year. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling led to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>