<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241674</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling that Cenvat credit could not be denied solely based on the timing of credit availed, as long as the goods were eventually received by the factory. The Judge emphasized that only interest could be charged for irregularly taken credit, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the reduction of penalty by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241674</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling that Cenvat credit could not be denied solely based on the timing of credit availed, as long as the goods were eventually received by the factory. The Judge emphasized that only interest could be charged for irregularly taken credit, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the reduction of penalty by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>