https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160995 Further pre-deposit was held unnecessary where the amount directed by the first appellate authority had already been deposited and the disputed statutory forms were available for verification. The earlier incorrect statement about possession of the forms was not treated as determinative, because the real issue was whether the forms were acceptable on the facts. The Tribunal was directed to hear the appeal without insisting on any additional deposit, while leaving the question of acceptability of the forms open for decision on merits. en-us Thu, 07 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:20:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160995 Further pre-deposit was held unnecessary where the amount directed by the first appellate authority had already been deposited and the disputed statutory forms were available for verification. The earlier incorrect statement about possession of the forms was not treated as determinative, because the real issue was whether the forms were acceptable on the facts. The Tribunal was directed to hear the appeal without insisting on any additional deposit, while leaving the question of acceptability of the forms open for decision on merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 07 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160995