<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 943 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160992</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the respondent to reverse Cenvat credit on capital goods before utilization to claim depreciation under the Income Tax Act. The Court found that this action did not violate the relevant notification, as it was equivalent to not taking the credit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the legality of the respondent&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 943 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160992</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the respondent to reverse Cenvat credit on capital goods before utilization to claim depreciation under the Income Tax Act. The Court found that this action did not violate the relevant notification, as it was equivalent to not taking the credit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the legality of the respondent&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>