<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1329 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241664</link>
    <description>At the interim stage, the Tribunal considered that a prima facie dispute existed on entitlement to abatement for goods transport agency services and that part of the demand had already been deposited, so the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the remaining dues was stayed pending final hearing. It also noted that consolidated declarations from transporters, stating that they were unregistered and had not taken Cenvat credit, could prima facie satisfy the documentary condition for abatement, and that the form of declaration need not be applied rigidly at that stage. The merits of the abatement claim were left open for final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:33:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1329 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241664</link>
      <description>At the interim stage, the Tribunal considered that a prima facie dispute existed on entitlement to abatement for goods transport agency services and that part of the demand had already been deposited, so the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the remaining dues was stayed pending final hearing. It also noted that consolidated declarations from transporters, stating that they were unregistered and had not taken Cenvat credit, could prima facie satisfy the documentary condition for abatement, and that the form of declaration need not be applied rigidly at that stage. The merits of the abatement claim were left open for final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>