<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1312 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241647</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed all income tax appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the appellants did not establish an employer-employee relationship with the company. Therefore, their remuneration could not be considered salary, and they were not entitled to standard deductions under Section 16 (1) of the Income Tax Act. The court also held that the revenue was not estopped from changing its stance based on the evidence presented for the current assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:31:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1312 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241647</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed all income tax appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the appellants did not establish an employer-employee relationship with the company. Therefore, their remuneration could not be considered salary, and they were not entitled to standard deductions under Section 16 (1) of the Income Tax Act. The court also held that the revenue was not estopped from changing its stance based on the evidence presented for the current assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>