<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1289 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 8,88,02,216/- against the appellant for defaulting in payment of Central Excise duty from April 2011 to March 2012. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 7,36,74,043/- within three months to avail relief, in accordance with Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rule, 2002. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of statutory provisions and ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying Cenvat Credit and imposing penalties due to the persistent default in duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1289 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 8,88,02,216/- against the appellant for defaulting in payment of Central Excise duty from April 2011 to March 2012. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 7,36,74,043/- within three months to avail relief, in accordance with Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rule, 2002. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of statutory provisions and ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying Cenvat Credit and imposing penalties due to the persistent default in duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>