<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1285 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241620</link>
    <description>Where excise assessments are final and not provisional, post-clearance discounts or credit notes do not change the duty correctly paid on the value applicable at the time of removal, so refund is not admissible on that basis. The earlier refund claim for a prior period was also time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On these facts, the refund claim was held unsustainable and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1285 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241620</link>
      <description>Where excise assessments are final and not provisional, post-clearance discounts or credit notes do not change the duty correctly paid on the value applicable at the time of removal, so refund is not admissible on that basis. The earlier refund claim for a prior period was also time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On these facts, the refund claim was held unsustainable and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>