<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1282 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241617</link>
    <description>Attachments for a back hoe and loader were treated as parts suitable for use solely or principally with machinery of Heading 8427, and the earlier Tribunal view was followed. On that basis, the goods were classified under Heading 8431.20, and the Department&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1282 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241617</link>
      <description>Attachments for a back hoe and loader were treated as parts suitable for use solely or principally with machinery of Heading 8427, and the earlier Tribunal view was followed. On that basis, the goods were classified under Heading 8431.20, and the Department&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>