https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160980 Deficient court fee on an alternative monetary claim did not invalidate the plaint or decree where fee had been paid on the principal claim and balance fee could be directed on the amount ultimately decreed. The objection that the balance fee was not paid within time was rejected. Concurrent findings based on documentary evidence were treated as factual, and the award of notice expenses, interest, and costs disclosed no legal infirmity. As no substantial question of law arose, the findings were left undisturbed and the decree in favour of the respondent was maintained. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:39:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160980 Deficient court fee on an alternative monetary claim did not invalidate the plaint or decree where fee had been paid on the principal claim and balance fee could be directed on the amount ultimately decreed. The objection that the balance fee was not paid within time was rejected. Concurrent findings based on documentary evidence were treated as factual, and the award of notice expenses, interest, and costs disclosed no legal infirmity. As no substantial question of law arose, the findings were left undisturbed and the decree in favour of the respondent was maintained. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160980