<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 988 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160976</link>
    <description>The State Legislature&#039;s power under Article 246(3) read with Entry 62 of List II extends to taxes on luxuries generally, and is not confined to luxuries in hotels or clubs alone; on that basis, the levy on accommodation and allied facilities in corporate hospitals was within legislative competence. The challenge to validity also failed because a statute cannot be struck down merely for possible misuse or perceived harshness; the challenger must establish a specific constitutional infirmity, and the presumption of constitutionality applied. The amendments were therefore upheld, and the Article 14 challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:19:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 988 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160976</link>
      <description>The State Legislature&#039;s power under Article 246(3) read with Entry 62 of List II extends to taxes on luxuries generally, and is not confined to luxuries in hotels or clubs alone; on that basis, the levy on accommodation and allied facilities in corporate hospitals was within legislative competence. The challenge to validity also failed because a statute cannot be struck down merely for possible misuse or perceived harshness; the challenger must establish a specific constitutional infirmity, and the presumption of constitutionality applied. The amendments were therefore upheld, and the Article 14 challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>