<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 988 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160976</link>
    <description>State legislative power under Article 246(3) read with Entry 62 of List II extends to taxes on luxuries generally and is not limited to luxuries supplied by hotels or clubs. Luxury denotes enjoyment beyond the necessaries of life; accordingly, taxing accommodation and related facilities in corporate hospitals may fall within that entry despite their possible medical necessity. Constitutional invalidity cannot rest solely on alleged harshness, arbitrariness, unreasonableness, or potential misuse. The challenger must establish a specific constitutional infirmity, subject to the presumption that legislation is constitutional. The amendments levying luxury tax on corporate hospitals were therefore treated as within legislative competence, and the Article 14 challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:19:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 988 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160976</link>
      <description>State legislative power under Article 246(3) read with Entry 62 of List II extends to taxes on luxuries generally and is not limited to luxuries supplied by hotels or clubs. Luxury denotes enjoyment beyond the necessaries of life; accordingly, taxing accommodation and related facilities in corporate hospitals may fall within that entry despite their possible medical necessity. Constitutional invalidity cannot rest solely on alleged harshness, arbitrariness, unreasonableness, or potential misuse. The challenger must establish a specific constitutional infirmity, subject to the presumption that legislation is constitutional. The amendments levying luxury tax on corporate hospitals were therefore treated as within legislative competence, and the Article 14 challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>