<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1351 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160974</link>
    <description>Common salt sold in sealed plastic bags falls within the expression &quot;sealed containers&quot; in item 5 of Schedule B to the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. A plastic bag sealed so that access to the contents requires breaking or tearing the seal is a container in ordinary commercial understanding, and prior interpretations supported that reading. The administrative clarification did not change the statutory test but merely reflected it. The common parlance argument was rejected because sealed plastic bags are understood as containers in everyday use, so the exemption for common salt did not apply and sales tax on such sales is valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:14:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1351 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160974</link>
      <description>Common salt sold in sealed plastic bags falls within the expression &quot;sealed containers&quot; in item 5 of Schedule B to the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. A plastic bag sealed so that access to the contents requires breaking or tearing the seal is a container in ordinary commercial understanding, and prior interpretations supported that reading. The administrative clarification did not change the statutory test but merely reflected it. The common parlance argument was rejected because sealed plastic bags are understood as containers in everyday use, so the exemption for common salt did not apply and sales tax on such sales is valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>