<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 987 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160961</link>
    <description>An appellate authority&#039;s stay discretion under section 20(3)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 must be exercised judicially on relevant material and supported by reasons. A conditional stay directing part payment in cash and the balance by bank guarantee is invalid if made mechanically without addressing the assessee&#039;s grounds, including a claim of double taxation on the same turnover. Because the impugned order contained no meaningful consideration of the facts or submissions and reflected non-application of mind, the High Court held the stay order unsustainable and the challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 16:19:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 987 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160961</link>
      <description>An appellate authority&#039;s stay discretion under section 20(3)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 must be exercised judicially on relevant material and supported by reasons. A conditional stay directing part payment in cash and the balance by bank guarantee is invalid if made mechanically without addressing the assessee&#039;s grounds, including a claim of double taxation on the same turnover. Because the impugned order contained no meaningful consideration of the facts or submissions and reflected non-application of mind, the High Court held the stay order unsustainable and the challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>