<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1267 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241602</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to reassess the tax treatment of Short Term Capital Gain based on holding period criteria. The decision emphasized considering intention behind transactions, frequency of trades, and holding period to differentiate between business income and capital gains in share transactions. Clear records and evidence are crucial to support the nature of share holdings for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1267 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241602</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to reassess the tax treatment of Short Term Capital Gain based on holding period criteria. The decision emphasized considering intention behind transactions, frequency of trades, and holding period to differentiate between business income and capital gains in share transactions. Clear records and evidence are crucial to support the nature of share holdings for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>