<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1257 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241592</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to add Rs. 13,00,000 to the appellant&#039;s income for the assessment year 2005-06. Despite the appellant providing details of unsecured creditors, the Court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to summon the creditors for verification and reliance solely on bank records justified the addition. The Court emphasized that the burden shifted to the department to prove the transactions&#039; genuineness once the appellant established creditor identities and documentation. The dismissal of the Income Tax Appeal affirmed the addition of the unsecured loans to the appellant&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1257 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241592</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to add Rs. 13,00,000 to the appellant&#039;s income for the assessment year 2005-06. Despite the appellant providing details of unsecured creditors, the Court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to summon the creditors for verification and reliance solely on bank records justified the addition. The Court emphasized that the burden shifted to the department to prove the transactions&#039; genuineness once the appellant established creditor identities and documentation. The dismissal of the Income Tax Appeal affirmed the addition of the unsecured loans to the appellant&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>