<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1251 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241586</link>
    <description>The court held that the interest income from Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) should be classified as income from other sources, not business income. Consequently, deductions under Section 32AB of the Income Tax Act were not applicable to the interest income. The court ruled in favor of the department, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1251 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241586</link>
      <description>The court held that the interest income from Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) should be classified as income from other sources, not business income. Consequently, deductions under Section 32AB of the Income Tax Act were not applicable to the interest income. The court ruled in favor of the department, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>