<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1245 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241580</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the decision allowing the reduction in fine and penalty for imported cosmetics, except for those bearing the trademarks &quot;DOVE&quot; and &quot;AXE,&quot; which were confiscated for violating Intellectual Property Rights. The lower appellate authority&#039;s ruling on the reduction in fine and penalty was deemed appropriate due to the technical nature of the violation and subsequent compliance post-import. Additionally, the re-export of DOVE and AXE was permitted based on a High Court decision allowing re-export of goods infringing Intellectual Property Rights. The Department&#039;s appeal challenging the reduction in fine, penalty, and re-export was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1245 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241580</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the decision allowing the reduction in fine and penalty for imported cosmetics, except for those bearing the trademarks &quot;DOVE&quot; and &quot;AXE,&quot; which were confiscated for violating Intellectual Property Rights. The lower appellate authority&#039;s ruling on the reduction in fine and penalty was deemed appropriate due to the technical nature of the violation and subsequent compliance post-import. Additionally, the re-export of DOVE and AXE was permitted based on a High Court decision allowing re-export of goods infringing Intellectual Property Rights. The Department&#039;s appeal challenging the reduction in fine, penalty, and re-export was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>