<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1089 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160923</link>
    <description>An addition to taxable turnover based on seized loose papers and surrounding circumstances was sustained where the papers disclosed transactions outside the books and were not reflected in the assessee&#039;s accounts. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to maintain the turnover addition for commodities other than gur, while restricting the gur-related addition after considering the full material, was upheld because no arbitrariness, infirmity, or reliance on irrelevant material was shown. The revisional challenge to the quantum of addition therefore failed, and the taxable turnover as modified by the Tribunal stood confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:27:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1089 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160923</link>
      <description>An addition to taxable turnover based on seized loose papers and surrounding circumstances was sustained where the papers disclosed transactions outside the books and were not reflected in the assessee&#039;s accounts. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to maintain the turnover addition for commodities other than gur, while restricting the gur-related addition after considering the full material, was upheld because no arbitrariness, infirmity, or reliance on irrelevant material was shown. The revisional challenge to the quantum of addition therefore failed, and the taxable turnover as modified by the Tribunal stood confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>