<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 947 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160874</link>
    <description>Interest could not be levied where the assessee had bona fide disputed its liability to tax on brass idols sold as art brassware, because the amount did not constitute admitted tax under section 8(1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act. As the tax liability was contested from the outset, the statutory basis for charging interest was absent. The Tribunal was therefore justified in deleting the interest, and that deletion was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:52:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 947 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160874</link>
      <description>Interest could not be levied where the assessee had bona fide disputed its liability to tax on brass idols sold as art brassware, because the amount did not constitute admitted tax under section 8(1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act. As the tax liability was contested from the outset, the statutory basis for charging interest was absent. The Tribunal was therefore justified in deleting the interest, and that deletion was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>