<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1209 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241544</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and directing reconsideration of the delay condonation application. Emphasizing that the appellant should not be denied a hearing on merits due to counsel&#039;s mistake, the Court highlighted the importance of proper exercise of discretion in such cases. The Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider the counsel&#039;s explanation for the delay led to the Court&#039;s decision to remand the case for a fair hearing on the merits, including the assessment issues raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 07:49:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1209 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241544</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and directing reconsideration of the delay condonation application. Emphasizing that the appellant should not be denied a hearing on merits due to counsel&#039;s mistake, the Court highlighted the importance of proper exercise of discretion in such cases. The Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider the counsel&#039;s explanation for the delay led to the Court&#039;s decision to remand the case for a fair hearing on the merits, including the assessment issues raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>