<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 907 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160864</link>
    <description>Filtration, chlorination, sterilisation, ozonation and bottling of water did not amount to manufacture under the sales tax exemption notification because the process only produced purified drinking water and not a commercially distinct product. The Court noted that the item remained water, did not meet the standards of mineral water, and the change in description from mineral water to drinking water did not alter that position. As the exemption claim failed on merits, withdrawal of the exemption certificate was upheld despite the absence of prior notice, and the bottles themselves did not give rise to a separate exemption basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 17:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 907 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160864</link>
      <description>Filtration, chlorination, sterilisation, ozonation and bottling of water did not amount to manufacture under the sales tax exemption notification because the process only produced purified drinking water and not a commercially distinct product. The Court noted that the item remained water, did not meet the standards of mineral water, and the change in description from mineral water to drinking water did not alter that position. As the exemption claim failed on merits, withdrawal of the exemption certificate was upheld despite the absence of prior notice, and the bottles themselves did not give rise to a separate exemption basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>