<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1343 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160856</link>
    <description>Garments supplied to a defence authority are classified by their real nature in common parlance: items made to specifications for a particular class of users, and not produced for general market sale in standard sizes, are treated as garments made to order rather than readymade garments. In tax matters, res judicata does not strictly apply, but a classification consistently accepted over a long period should not ordinarily be reopened when the underlying facts remain unchanged. The commentary also states that settled fundamental aspects should not be reactivated as stale controversies, and that reassessment at a higher rate is unjustified where the factual position has not changed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 16:40:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1343 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160856</link>
      <description>Garments supplied to a defence authority are classified by their real nature in common parlance: items made to specifications for a particular class of users, and not produced for general market sale in standard sizes, are treated as garments made to order rather than readymade garments. In tax matters, res judicata does not strictly apply, but a classification consistently accepted over a long period should not ordinarily be reopened when the underlying facts remain unchanged. The commentary also states that settled fundamental aspects should not be reactivated as stale controversies, and that reassessment at a higher rate is unjustified where the factual position has not changed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>