<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 799 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160850</link>
    <description>Tax classification of mild steel flanges depended on whether they were merely flanges or fittings for steel tubes falling within the iron and steel entry in the Fourth Schedule. The Court held that a flange is not invariably a tube fitting and that its tax treatment turns on intended use and function. Because the available material did not permit conclusive classification, the issue required factual examination by the assessing authority and could not be treated as a mistake apparent from the record for rectification. The notices proposing taxation under entry 6 of Part P of the Second Schedule were quashed to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 16:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 799 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160850</link>
      <description>Tax classification of mild steel flanges depended on whether they were merely flanges or fittings for steel tubes falling within the iron and steel entry in the Fourth Schedule. The Court held that a flange is not invariably a tube fitting and that its tax treatment turns on intended use and function. Because the available material did not permit conclusive classification, the issue required factual examination by the assessing authority and could not be treated as a mistake apparent from the record for rectification. The notices proposing taxation under entry 6 of Part P of the Second Schedule were quashed to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>