<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1293 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160848</link>
    <description>A notification reducing the rate of tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act applied only to the basic tax expressly covered by it and did not extend to additional sales tax levied separately under section 5D. Section 5D created an independent levy computed as an extra charge on the tax payable under sections 5 and 5A, so the concessional rate could not be used to reduce that additional component unless the notification expressly so provided. The Commissioner&#039;s clarification was therefore legally correct, and the challenge failed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 16:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1293 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160848</link>
      <description>A notification reducing the rate of tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act applied only to the basic tax expressly covered by it and did not extend to additional sales tax levied separately under section 5D. Section 5D created an independent levy computed as an extra charge on the tax payable under sections 5 and 5A, so the concessional rate could not be used to reduce that additional component unless the notification expressly so provided. The Commissioner&#039;s clarification was therefore legally correct, and the challenge failed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>