https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160844 The court found that the stay order allowing the petitioner to avoid tax payment was illegal and emphasized the importance of exercising judicial discretion responsibly in matters affecting public revenue. It highlighted the need to prevent tax evasion and directed similar cases to be decided uniformly by a division bench. The court stressed that stays should only be granted when tax imposition is prima facie illegal and underscored the duty to uphold public interest while protecting litigants' rights. The judgment emphasized caution in granting interim orders and consistency in handling revenue matters to prevent disruptions in tax collection procedures. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:59:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160844 The court found that the stay order allowing the petitioner to avoid tax payment was illegal and emphasized the importance of exercising judicial discretion responsibly in matters affecting public revenue. It highlighted the need to prevent tax evasion and directed similar cases to be decided uniformly by a division bench. The court stressed that stays should only be granted when tax imposition is prima facie illegal and underscored the duty to uphold public interest while protecting litigants' rights. The judgment emphasized caution in granting interim orders and consistency in handling revenue matters to prevent disruptions in tax collection procedures. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 07 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160844